Did Venus eat its own moon?
[post_content]
Disclaimer: This article has been automatically aggregated from
Scientists may finally know why Venus, Earth’s twin, lacks a moon, finding that the hottest planet in the solar system may have consumed its own natural satellite.
Venus is often referred to as Earth’s twin due to its size, mass, rocky composition, and distance from the sun, but there are some glaring differences between the two planets. Aside from Venus’ blisteringly hot temperature, which could melt lead, incredible surface pressure, violent high-speed winds, and clouds of sulfuric acid, one of the key differences between Earth and Venus can be seen from afar. While our planet has a constant companion in the form of the moon, Venus lacks a moon of its own. In fact, the only solar system planets lacking moons are Venus, the second planet from the sun, and Mercury, the closest planet to the sun.
One question that scientists have puzzled over for years is whether Venus always lacked a moon, or if the hottest planet in the solar system once had a natural satellite and somehow lost it. Now, a team of researchers may have arrived at an answer, determining the fate that would have befallen a hypothetical moon orbiting Venus.
“I have always had a fascination with moon formation and evolution in the solar system, and particularly with Venus since my research is centered around its evolution and potential for past habitability,” team leader Stephen R. Kane of the University of California, Riverside told Space.com. “Venus is Earth’s twin, and both are nearly identical in size, mass, and composition. However, Earth has a large moon, and Venus has no moon at all, not even a small captured satellite.
“Venus undoubtedly experienced large impacts, just as Earth has, and so has had as much, if not more, opportunity to form a moon similar to what we see in our own skies.”
Kane and colleagues constructed a simulation to test their ideas of what could have become of the Venusian moon.
“The work involved going back to fundamental physics and creating the simulation from the ground up, which I validated by ensuring I could reproduce the evolution of the Earth-moon system,” Kane said. “The moment I realized that our model provided a complete explanation for Venus not having a moon was an exciting one!”
Did Venus consume its own moon?
The team modelled a gravitational tug-of-war between Venus, a hypothetical moon, and the sun, following this forward over billions of years.
“This is the same physics that governs our own moon, which is slowly drifting away from Earth. We ran the calculations across a wide range of possibilities for how fast Venus was spinning and how massive its moon might have been, using two independent mathematical descriptions of how tides work,” Kane explained.
The researcher said that this was done so the conclusions reached wouldn’t hinge on one set of assumptions. They found in most cases a Venusian moon would not drift safely outward the way ours does. Instead, the modelling showed that a moon orbiting Venus would eventually reverse its course and spiral inward, causing it to be torn apart by the planet’s gravity.
Kane and colleagues found that possessing an intimidating size wouldn’t guarantee a Venusian moon’s survival, either.
“An interesting aspect is that a heavier moon is destroyed faster, since a massive moon would drain Venus’s spin so efficiently that it hastens its destruction,” Kane added.
But are there any circumstances under which a Venusian moon could have survived?
“Survival came down to two main things: Venus had to be spinning fast when the moon formed, with a day shorter than about 12 hours, and the moon couldn’t be too massive, up to roughly the mass of our own moon,” team leader Stephen R. Kane of the University of California, Riverside told Space.com. “In that narrow window, the moon migrates outward and stabilizes, much as Earth’s did. Outside that range, the moon is unfortunately doomed to be consumed by Venus.
“So a surviving moon would have had to be modest in size, orbiting a rapidly spinning early Venus, which are conditions that don’t match what we think early Venus was actually like.”
We may never conclusively know if Venus has indeed destroyed its own moon, as Kane thinks that collecting direct evidence from astronomical observations will be very difficult.
“Finding direct observational evidence is pretty tough. A moon lost billions of years ago would leave little to no direct trace we can point a telescope at today, so we can’t observe the event itself,” Kane said. “However, there are indirect avenues. For example, if a moon was destroyed and its debris rained down on Venus, it could have left a chemical fingerprint in the planet’s surface or atmosphere, and upcoming missions to Venus, including NASA’s DAVINCI (Deep Atmosphere Venus Investigation of Noble gases, Chemistry, and Imaging) probe, will measure atmospheric composition in detail.”
If missions such as DAVINCI could help us develop a better understanding of the Venusian interior, then this would also improve the models such as the one used in this research. That is because the outcomes of such models depend on properties of Venus’s interior, which aren’t currently well understood.
“There’s a broader test beyond our solar system because our results predict that slowly rotating, Venus-like planets around other stars should generically lack large moons, so as astronomers begin searching for moons around exoplanets, that’s a prediction that can eventually be checked against real data,” Kane said.
Kane and colleagues don’t intend to rest on their laurels while further data from Venus or even Venus-like exoplanets are delivered. They have plenty to work on in the meantime.
“There are numerous implications of our work that I would like to explore further. These include the compositional and atmospheric effects of a Venusian moon consumption event that may be testable now,” Kane concluded. I would also like to explore similar effects for Mercury and Mars, and conduct further studies on exoplanet cases where such moon collision scenarios may have occurred.”
The team’s research is available as a pre-peer-reviewed paper on the repository site arXiv.
for informational purposes only. We do not claim ownership, accuracy, or liability for the content provided. All rights belong to the original publisher.