I would be careful about starting fresh under the Inc until the old history is mapped clearly. If the PO Box / failed video-verification trail is still attached internally, a new profile with overlapping service area, phone, site, license, or owner data could look like an evasion pattern rather than a clean fix.

For a SAB with repeated deceptive-content denials, I would package the case like this:

1. profile ID and all reinstatement / support case IDs
2. exact suspension reasons and dates, especially the two deceptive-content notices
3. PO Box timeline: when it was used, when it was removed, and what address/service-area settings are active now
4. failed video-verification dates and what was shown in each attempt
5. CA contractor license, business registration, insurance if available, and service-area proof
6. website/NAP consistency screenshots, including footer/contact/service-area pages
7. a short change log showing the current profile no longer uses the old risky setup

The narrow question I would ask support / PE is not simply “please reinstate,” but: is the remaining issue the historic PO Box, failed video verification state, or a current profile/entity mismatch? That gives someone a specific thread to pull instead of treating it like another generic appeal.



Source link